How do we ask questions about priority populations in a person-centered approach?

During our February Office Hours, we talked about how to approach the unique needs of priority populations, which are groups affected by suicide and often connected with experiences of marginalisation and discriminations. We discussed ways to apply the SafeSide Framework without leaving a person feeling judged for who they are. 

When connecting with a person and seeking to understand their long-term risk factors it is important to be aware of different factors and groups with high rates of suicide including men, First Nations people and people who are gender or sexually diverse.

However, sometimes focusing on risk factors that increase suicide concerns can lead to the person feeling judged due to a perceived assumption they are weaker or more vulnerable but each of these groups also has unique strengths and capacities.

When referring to groups of people, try using language like “priority populations for suicide prevention” which acknowledges the overrepresentation of these demographics without dismissing how these groups can also be a strength and protective factor for the person. 

This is one reason why SafeSide’s programming rarely refers to statistics or demographics - applying epidemiology to one specific person can be problematic by focusing on general trends instead of the individual’s unique strengths, context and situation. 

Instead, ask them about their experiences within that demographic and how it impacts them. 

You could try saying: 

“What does the LGBTQI+ community provide you in terms of strengths or support? What are your experiences as a member of that community that don’t support your efforts to feel better?”

By focusing on a person’s specific experiences when applying the SafeSide Framework, together you can create a more targeted person-specific safety plan that can provide relief and hope and perhaps save a life. 

Share your thoughts in the comments below.